>Shahrukh Khan: A Division Bench Of Bombay High Court Dismisses Frivolous Petition Against The Star
Bollywood Shahrukh Khanwas spared a PIL filed against him by activist Simpreet Singh for allegedly building a number of real estate by extending his bungalowMannat who was considered a heritage building and was built in gross violation of coastal regulation zone or the CRZ, according to the petition. However, the Bombay High Court issued a statement indicating that the PIL was a completely frivolous and that was a complete waste of time for court officials. So the rules of the petitioner was charged with the costs for wasting valuable court time. According to the petition of the site where movie star Shahrukh Khan had built his building was reserved for an Art Gallery said SRK had flouted the rules. According to reports from the State Government had informed the Court that the building was officially cleared off the place reserved for the Art Gallery in 2000 and that SRK had bought only in 2003 and construction began only in 2006 so it was not at all against all the rules. At first glance is that the petition was merely a publicity stunt oriented and because the court has many important PILs to see where the poor have made and are very crucial, as PIL as submitted by the activist of no value and would send the wrong signals to the common man. So a fine of Rs. 20,000 was imposed on the petitioner for wasting the courts time.